return to the homepage
Home Blog

Bicycle City

Primal Cycling/Apparel

Wilmington Grand Prix Weekend May 17-19

A tug of war over livability

Washington really is an odd place to do business. Even as the City prepares for the Summer exodus to the beach or home districts (or really anywhere away from the heat and humidity), the last few days of any Congressional session are alive with possibilities and danger, and interest groups such as ours have to be prepared for almost anything, flexible, and on 24 hour alert!

As I write, the House is debating the Transportation Appropriations bill – the annual approval of the funds and programs that the Department of Transportation spends and passes on to the States for various programs. Normally, there’s not much to get worked up about in this particular bill. The major programs and funding levels are set (or “authorized”) every five or six years by the transportation bill – and the appropriators really only get to play with the discretionary parts of the USDOT’s budget, which are relatively small.

This year, things are a little different. There are a handful of Members of Congress who still want to strip every funding program for bikes out of the budget – this time Congressman Broun of Georgia tried to introduce an amendment to prevent ANY funds in the bill going to bike paths; that proposal wasn’t even considered in bounds, so we didn’t have to go through the fire drill of getting folks wound up to defend bike funding. (Don’t worry, though, it seems inevitable it will come up again…!)

There’s also a major impasse over the next transportation bill, which means there are no new programs to be funded…but there’s a new administration and a new interest in programs like livability that some legislators really want to get moving. Of course, we want those programs funded as well, because they are likely to result in additional investment in bicycling. Two of our most favorite people in Washington are supporting a $200 million livability program in the bill – Secretary LaHood and Congressman Blumenauer – and ordinarily we would be right behind it.

Unfortunately, they find themselves ranged against two more of our most favorite people in Washington – Representatives Oberstar and DeFazio. They are both supporters of livability, of course – they wrote livability into the draft transportation bill after all. They are fiercely protective of their role as leaders of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and authorizers of the programs that USDOT and the state DOTs implement. We are grateful for this authority, as it  protects programs like the transportation enhancement and Safe Routes to School from potential annual attack by appropriators. The struggle in Congress between authorizers and appropriators is age-old, deep-seated, and transcends bicycle issues: authorizers never want to cede power to appropriators. In this case they don’t want a livability program created without their say because of the precedent it might set next year and the year after; they’d much rather have a new transportation bill written!

So, we find ourselves, along with other advocates, in a challenging position! We are standing on the sidelines watching and waiting. All four of our champions want strong livability initiatives in the USDOT and Federal Highway Administration…that isn’t the issue. The issue is how it gets done, and that’s something only Congress can work out. And with these four players involved…how can we possibly take sides.

UPDATE: The DeFazio Amendment just passed.

My Signature

Andy Clarke
League President

Andy Clarke was appointed to the position of Executive Director in April of 2004 after successfully leading efforts to create, interpret and implement the various transportation programs that are available to improve conditions for bicycling and walking as the League’s State and Local Advocacy Director. Before joining the League in February 2003, Clarke was on contract to provide technical assistance to the highly regarded Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center on site at the Federal Highway Administration. He is on the Board of Directors for America Bikes, and a member of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycling Professionals.


7 Responses to “A tug of war over livability”

  1. Donald Pillsbury Says:

    I understand your frustration regarding the opposition. One tactic that I’ve used that has drawn some intrigue is pointing out to the transportation folks the baby boomers are rapidly graying. What infrastructure are they currently providing that will accommodate an increasing percentage of the population that will have to have their keys taken away? Pedestrian and cycling routes connecting residential and commercial districts provide seniors continued mobility and independence. (And note, I used cycling – not bicycling – some seniors favor the adult tricycle for stability.) I do seem to recall reading of a retirement community that made extensive use of the tricycles but I can’t seem to find that reference. If you know of where it is, I would greatly appreciate learning more about it.

    In the words of Team Wonderbike: “Bike more, drive less”

  2. Streetsblog Capitol Hill » Today’s Headlines Says:

    [...] House Dems Quarrel About Livability Provisions in Transpo Appropriations Bill (LAB blog) [...]

  3. khal spencer Says:

    Good luck, Andy. We really need to stay out of the way of the protocol fights but remind all our allies in Congress of the need to stay focussed on the mission.

    While it is important to provide transportation alternatives to aging boomers (and as I race towards my sixties, I count myself in that group) I would be really careful about using hot button phrases such as “…have to take their keys away…”. It is definitely a huge issue headed our way, but tends to terrify a lot of people who are headed into the golden years and afraid of lost independence. So you are right, we need to design programs for older folks as well as others who cannot or should not be driving, but need to couch the rationale carefully.

    We lost a pair of motorcyclists to a dazed and confused 89 year old motorist a few years back up here in BombTown. I still remember being interviewed as a witness to that crash, and watching the lifeless bodies lying in the road.

  4. Chris Morfas Says:

    Andy, thank you for this informative and digestible post.

  5. Brent Hugh Says:

    The trucking advocates are crowing about the fact that the office of livability was removed from the federal spending bill:

    http://www.landlinemag.com/todays_news/Daily/2010/July10/071910/072210-01.htm

    Do you have any idea what happened there or what the significance is?

  6. full size van rental Says:

    He who would travel happily must travel light. – Quote by Antoine de St. Exupery

  7. Manual Social Bookmarking Says:

    Thank you for this good publish. It contains a lot facts which I have to have. I’m going to bookmark your web site by my next stop by.

American Bicyclist
American Bicyclist, the magazine. Find out the latest news, events and developments in the world of bicycling with the League's quarterly publication.