<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poring over the 2009 American Community Survey Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/</link>
	<description>Blog for bikeleague</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: weglowodany</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-34283</link>
		<dc:creator>weglowodany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-34283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad to be one of the   visitants on this great  website   (:,  regards  for  putting up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to be one of the   visitants on this great  website   (:,  regards  for  putting up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Pregnant after Miscarriage</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33882</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Pregnant after Miscarriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m now extremely satisfied after reading this posting as well as I agree with the last portion of this post. By the way, I have read this specific elsewhere too. Have you got any other website too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now extremely satisfied after reading this posting as well as I agree with the last portion of this post. By the way, I have read this specific elsewhere too. Have you got any other website too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: replicas watches</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33803</link>
		<dc:creator>replicas watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33708</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Downloaded the spreadsheet. Great data.

I think there might be something wrong with the 2006 walking share column. Lots of really abnormally low numbers that bump up again in 2007. New York is really weird (.06%) between over 9-10% in other years. Maybe a formula issue?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloaded the spreadsheet. Great data.</p>
<p>I think there might be something wrong with the 2006 walking share column. Lots of really abnormally low numbers that bump up again in 2007. New York is really weird (.06%) between over 9-10% in other years. Maybe a formula issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Cool Bike Stories &#8211; Planetsave</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33584</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Cool Bike Stories &#8211; Planetsave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 9. Poring over the 2009 American Community Survey Numbers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9. Poring over the 2009 American Community Survey Numbers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biking Bis - Bicycle Touring and More</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33530</link>
		<dc:creator>Biking Bis - Bicycle Touring and More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Top 10 big cities for bicycle commuting...&lt;/strong&gt;

About 1 commuter out of 200 used a bicycle as the primary mode of transportation to get to work in 2009, a figure that didn&#039;t change one iota since 2008.
Meanwhile, the number of commuters who admit to driving alone to work rose by 1% in the same tim...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 10 big cities for bicycle commuting&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>About 1 commuter out of 200 used a bicycle as the primary mode of transportation to get to work in 2009, a figure that didn&#8217;t change one iota since 2008.<br />
Meanwhile, the number of commuters who admit to driving alone to work rose by 1% in the same tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Top USA Bicycling Cities &#171; Bike Monkey Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33500</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Top USA Bicycling Cities &#171; Bike Monkey Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] League of American Bicyclists took a more detailed look at the top 70 American cities (by population), noting that, nationally, bicycling for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] League of American Bicyclists took a more detailed look at the top 70 American cities (by population), noting that, nationally, bicycling for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Top USA Bicycling Cities &#187; Cyclelicious Bicycle Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33498</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Top USA Bicycling Cities &#187; Cyclelicious Bicycle Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] League of American Bicyclists took a more detailed look at the top 70 American cities (by population), noting that, nationally, bicycling for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] League of American Bicyclists took a more detailed look at the top 70 American cities (by population), noting that, nationally, bicycling for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33488</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Take a Look at What the 2009 Census Numbers Mean for Cycling (LAB) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take a Look at What the 2009 Census Numbers Mean for Cycling (LAB) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khal spencer</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/09/poring-over-the-2009-american-community-survey-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-33482</link>
		<dc:creator>khal spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3589#comment-33482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone look at correlations between bicycling and economic factors in these cities? I wonder if anyone is bicycling to work or other destinations because they are in tougher economic straits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone look at correlations between bicycling and economic factors in these cities? I wonder if anyone is bicycling to work or other destinations because they are in tougher economic straits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
