<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $1 billion to bicycle and pedestrians projects in FY 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/</link>
	<description>Blog for bikeleague</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: $1 Billion to Bicycle and Pedestrians Projects in 2010, Enough for One Bridge &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33786</link>
		<dc:creator>$1 Billion to Bicycle and Pedestrians Projects in 2010, Enough for One Bridge &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more from the LAB here: $1 billion to bicycle and pedestrians projects in FY 2010. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the LAB here: $1 billion to bicycle and pedestrians projects in FY 2010. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Roundup: November 4 &#124; Tucson Velo</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33647</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Roundup: November 4 &#124; Tucson Velo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] $1 billion to bicycle and pedestrians projects in FY 2010 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $1 billion to bicycle and pedestrians projects in FY 2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cycling and the Election Cycle of 2010 &#124; Commute by Bike</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33630</link>
		<dc:creator>Cycling and the Election Cycle of 2010 &#124; Commute by Bike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] $4 billion, about one-fourth is used on cycling infrastructure. To put this into perspective, is this recent post from The League of American Cyclists: It is being used to create miles of bicycling facilities, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $4 billion, about one-fourth is used on cycling infrastructure. To put this into perspective, is this recent post from The League of American Cyclists: It is being used to create miles of bicycling facilities, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33629</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In FMIS, the states code projects as &#039;bike-ped&#039; and do not separate the two modes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In FMIS, the states code projects as &#8216;bike-ped&#8217; and do not separate the two modes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom murphy</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33628</link>
		<dc:creator>tom murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do you say &#039;spending on bike-ped projects&#039;.  If 10.9% of the 12% of all trips is from walking, and only 1% is from biking, wouldn&#039;t you be more correct calling them &#039;ped-bike projects&#039;?
Of course, I have no access to the money spreadsheet so I can&#039;t determine if the bucks aren&#039;t being pushed to enhance the routes of the bikers at the expense of the walkers, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say &#8216;spending on bike-ped projects&#8217;.  If 10.9% of the 12% of all trips is from walking, and only 1% is from biking, wouldn&#8217;t you be more correct calling them &#8216;ped-bike projects&#8217;?<br />
Of course, I have no access to the money spreadsheet so I can&#8217;t determine if the bucks aren&#8217;t being pushed to enhance the routes of the bikers at the expense of the walkers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Bike-Ped Funding Dips as Stimulus Spending Slows</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33626</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Bike-Ped Funding Dips as Stimulus Spending Slows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Via the League of American Bicyclists, new information is out about how much the feds are spending on bike-ped  projects. While federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects is down a bit from last year&#8217;s all-time high, it still comes in at more than a billion dollars. A third of the money is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which begs the question of what will happen to bike-ped funding once the stimulus funds dry up. Bike-ped funding dropped off some after a bonanza year in 2009, but it still tops $1 billion. Bike League [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via the League of American Bicyclists, new information is out about how much the feds are spending on bike-ped  projects. While federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects is down a bit from last year&#8217;s all-time high, it still comes in at more than a billion dollars. A third of the money is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which begs the question of what will happen to bike-ped funding once the stimulus funds dry up. Bike-ped funding dropped off some after a bonanza year in 2009, but it still tops $1 billion. Bike League [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khal spencer</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2010/11/1-billion-to-bicycle-and-pedestrians-projects-in-fy-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-33625</link>
		<dc:creator>khal spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=3827#comment-33625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given what is about to happen to Congress (if the polls are correct) maybe we ought to be proudly telling everyone how cheap it is to use bicycling as transportation, not how much money we are spending on it. 

The operative words are &quot;...the amount of federal money spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects, nation-wide, in FY 2010 is equal to the cost of just one (heavy duty) bridge...&quot;. In areas where bicycling can actually serve a serious transportation function (i.e., compact areas with good climate and manageable terrane; throw in high congestion and parking costs as a bonus), we really do provide more bang for the buck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given what is about to happen to Congress (if the polls are correct) maybe we ought to be proudly telling everyone how cheap it is to use bicycling as transportation, not how much money we are spending on it. </p>
<p>The operative words are &#8220;&#8230;the amount of federal money spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects, nation-wide, in FY 2010 is equal to the cost of just one (heavy duty) bridge&#8230;&#8221;. In areas where bicycling can actually serve a serious transportation function (i.e., compact areas with good climate and manageable terrane; throw in high congestion and parking costs as a bonus), we really do provide more bang for the buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
