<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many bike commuters does your city have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/</link>
	<description>Blog for bikeleague</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hokan</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/comment-page-1/#comment-34396</link>
		<dc:creator>hokan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 22:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=5409#comment-34396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The top 10 list for share who are female seems to be borked, perhaps due to small sample sizes?

I&#039;m guessing that Minneapolis with 45% should be on the top 10 list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top 10 list for share who are female seems to be borked, perhaps due to small sample sizes?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that Minneapolis with 45% should be on the top 10 list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khal Spencer</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/comment-page-1/#comment-34395</link>
		<dc:creator>Khal Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 21:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=5409#comment-34395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking for Santa Fe, but I guess it didn&#039;t break the 65k population count till the 2010 Census.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for Santa Fe, but I guess it didn&#8217;t break the 65k population count till the 2010 Census.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brooking</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/comment-page-1/#comment-34394</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=5409#comment-34394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t count door zone bike lanes as a positive thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t count door zone bike lanes as a positive thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Chavez</title>
		<link>http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/05/how-many-bike-commuters-does-your-city-have/comment-page-1/#comment-34393</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Chavez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/?p=5409#comment-34393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s sad that 0.0% bike commuting is reported for my city, Palmdale, California. 

And that the other large city in the Antelope Valley, Lancaster, California, is not even included on the list, though it meets the population threshold.

No wonder Palmdale doesn&#039;t have any interest in bicycle issues. Even though there ARE bike commuters here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad that 0.0% bike commuting is reported for my city, Palmdale, California. </p>
<p>And that the other large city in the Antelope Valley, Lancaster, California, is not even included on the list, though it meets the population threshold.</p>
<p>No wonder Palmdale doesn&#8217;t have any interest in bicycle issues. Even though there ARE bike commuters here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
