Social Equity and Bike Sharing Systems
Sometime between dinner with a friend last night and waking up this morning, the back tire on my bike completely deflated. Sure, I know how to fix a flat, but it was early, I was groggy — and I needed to get out the door. Digging out my tire levers, rooting around for a spare tube and fighting with the super-tight bolts on my back wheel wasn’t the way I was hoping to start the day.
Luckily, I had another option.
Within a one-block radius of my apartment in Southwest D.C. there were no fewer than three dozen ready-to-ride bikes just waiting to be unlocked with my little red Capital Bikeshare key. In less than two minutes, I was pedaling my way downtown — no tire maintenance required.
Across the country, bike sharing systems are dramatically growing the ranks of transportation cyclists, making it easy and convenient to pedal short trips or travel that last mile after a multi-modal commute. Already, we’re seeing more cyclists riding Capital Bikeshare here in D.C., and major cities like New York and Los Angeles are getting in the game later this year.
But as these systems proliferate, are they benefiting everyone who wants to ride? Are the stations distributed equitably or centralized in certain neighborhoods? Are the pricing structures and policies accessible to all residents, or do you have to have a credit card and a smartphone to find and pay for a ride?
How are bike share systems addressing these complex challenges? Last week, the Federal Transit Administration and the National Center for Transit Research hosted a webinar on “Social Equity and Bikesharing” to tackle these very questions.
Bikesharing systems are rolling out all over the country, attracting new riders to bicycling as transportation, and providing a convenient way to access other transit services. But a significant challenge for system planners and managers is ensuring that this new and exciting means of transportation can be accessed by a wide cross-section of the community. This webinar provided an overview of exciting and innovative ways that systems are pursuing social equity in bikesharing, and provide summaries and lessons learned from Capital Bikeshare in Arlington, VA, and Hubway in Boston, MA.
Great presentation; view the webinar or download the presenters’ slides here.

Carolyn Szczepanski
Communications Director
Carolyn joined the League in March 2012, after two years at the Alliance for Biking & Walking. In addition to managing the League's blog, magazine and other communications, Carolyn organized the first National Women's Bicycling Summit and launched the League's newest program: Women Bike. Before she crossed over to advocacy, she was a professional journalist for nearly 10 years.

Blog




May 8th, 2012 at 11:08 am
Two relevant National Public Radio stories:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/05/03/151955048/why-do-bike-share-riders-skip-helmets
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/05/07/152184370/even-a-small-slowdown-in-obesitys-rise-would-save-big-money
May 9th, 2012 at 8:56 am
[...] Socially Equitable Is Bike-Sharing? (BikeLeague) Email Share [...]
May 9th, 2012 at 12:48 pm
See DC study(Daddio). It suggests that to sustain itself financially it needs to concentrate on young close-in dense areas. Expanding, or going far afield, requires a proliferation of stations, not necessarily bikes. This could prove not to be sustainable.
DC is paid for with Federal funds. It is likely any expansion of Alta in NYC will need local support.
May 21st, 2012 at 1:29 pm
Just a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw great style and design .